Monthly Archives: July 2026

Palestinians, Jews and the Nation of Israel

TENTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST

Isaiah 55:1-5

Psalm 145:8-9, 14-21

Romans 9:1-5

Matthew 14:13-21

Prayer of the Day: Glorious God, your generosity waters the world with goodness, and you cover creation with abundance. Awaken in us a hunger for the food that satisfies both body and spirit, and with this food fill all the starving world; through your Son, Jesus Christ, our Savior and Lord.

“They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and from them, according to the flesh, comes the Christ, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.”  Romas 9:4-5.

I travel Cape Cod’s Route 6 frequently these days. That arterial highway is the only means of travel up through the Outer Cape stretching from Orleans to Provincetown. Along the way I pass a church that proudly proclaims “We stand with Israel” and frequently flies the Israeli flag. I have not spoken with the pastor of that congregation or any of its members about its support for Israel, but I strongly suspect that they view such support as an outgrowth of their faith. Identification with the State of Israel is common place among white evangelical Christians. For some, support for Israel amounts to a stand against antisemitism. As one evangelical woman with whom I recently spoke expressed it, “We don’t want to make the same mistake the church in Germany made during the second world war.” No doubt the horrific attack by Hamas against Israeli civilians evoked sympathy for the people of Israel-as well it should.

Many evangelicals, however, subscribe to a fringe doctrine known as “premillennialism.” According to this teaching, a blueprint for the imminent end of the world and the return of Christ to establish a one thousand year Christian theocracy is woven into the Hebrew and Christian scriptures. There is much disagreement among evangelicals holding these views over the details of how the end will unfold. But in premillennial thought, the nation of Israel plays a crucial role in igniting the wars and tribulations that will plunge the earth into a hopeless condition of demonic global rule. After this, Christ will return and with him the resurrected Christians to crush the powers of evil and rule the world for the next thousand years. Support of Israel, then, is to be allied with God’s plan for the windup of history. It is rather like lighting the fuse of Armageddon. While most of us mainliners do not hold premillennial views, I find support for the state of Israel to be for many a religious moral obligation. In their minds, opposition to Israel amounts to opposing or even persecuting the Jews.

To be clear, antisemitism is antithetical to faith in Jesus Christ. I have argued in a pervious article that Saint Paul would be baffled by the divorce between the modern church and the people of Israel. See Judaism, Christianity, Antisemitism and Saint Paul. As the apostle understood it, the church did not supersede Israel. Rather, the church was the door through which God invites the gentiles into Israel’s covenant relationship with God. The above passage illustrates Paul’s understanding that Israel was, is and always will be “adopted” by God and in primary possession not only of the ancient covenants, the Torah and the prophetic promises, but also the One we worship as the Christ. Though the Jewish faithful do not view Jesus as their messiah, they worship the God Jesus invoked as Father and whose covenant partnership with them continues unbroken. Though he was sometimes less than clear about the specifics, Paul was convinced that the destiny of Israel was integral to God’s redemptive purpose for all creation. To be a disciple of Jesus is to recognize God’s past faithfulness to God’s people Israel and God’s continuing faithfulness through the ancient covenants to which the Hebrew Scriptures testify. To denigrate the Jews is to blaspheme the God and Father of Jesus Christ.

That said, it needs also to be said clearly and unequivocally that recognizing, affirming and honoring God’s people Israel is not the same as supporting the policies, practices and geopolitical aims of the nation of Israel. The nation of Israel is just that: a nation. As such, it is a humanly established entity no more or less than any other nation. It does not have divine sanction any more than any other nation, including the United States, notwithstanding some very misguided notions to the contrary. The nation of Israel does not, on the basis of some biblical mandate, get a pass on practices that can fairly be characterized as unlawful annexation, war crimes and ethnic cleansing. Thus, while one might fairly argue that there are strategic, military and humanitarian reasons for supporting the government of Israel, one cannot argue, from a Christian perspective, that support for the nation of Israel is a religious duty. Accordingly, while disciples of Jesus must advocate for the rights of Jewish people everywhere and resist all forms of antisemitism, they must also decry and condemn in no uncertain terms the Israeli attacks on Palestinian civilians in Gaza and the violent dispossession of Palestinians living in the West Bank.

American Christians and Lutheran Christians in particular need to tread lightly here. We need to use sparingly such loaded and inflammatory terms as “colonialism,” “genocide,” and “ethnic cleansing.” What Israelis are rightly condemned for doing to the Palestinians over the last 80 years the United States government has been doing to our own indigenous population for the last three centuries. Moreover, the move to create a Jewish state arose from the well founded belief of Jews, having suffered centuries of pogroms in Europe culminating in the Holocaust, that there could be no safe place in the world for them unless they made one for themselves. Lest we be too hard on the Jews who migrated to and claimed land in Palestine, let us recall that we are among the many nations that refused asylum to the family of Ann Frank and thousands of other Jews seeking refuge from Hitler’s “final solution.” See The American Murder of Anne Frank-and now Syrian Refugees. Stripped of their citizenship in Germany and other Nazi occupied territories, the Jews were rendered non persons. They had no right to exist anywhere in the world. No nation was obliged to receive them. The history of the State of Israel illustrates the brutal reality that stateless refugees are not afforded human rights and have no protection against oppression and violence beyond a few toothless UN resolutions. It is one of history’s cruel ironies that Palestinians, another stateless people, are suffering the same fate their oppressors knew so well.

Finally, those of us in the Lutheran tradition must recognize that we played a particularly shameful role ignoring and, in many instances, facilitating the Nazi oppression of Jews in Europe. Martin Luther’s despicable writings denigrating the Jews constitute a dark blot on the Reformation at the heart of our religious identity. For example, Paul Althaus, a Lutheran scholar in Germany from the 1930s through the 1950s. Greeted the rise of Hitler as a “gift and miracle from God.” Gerhard Kittel, a German Lutheran theologian and New Testament scholar, joined the Nazi Party in 1933. He produced writings on the “Jewish Question” that promoted the Third Reich’s exclusionary policies. Though there were notable exceptions to the church’s complicity in the Nazi’s genocidal policies, such as Deitrich Bohnoeffer and Martin Niemöller, they were exceptions. At best, the church remained indifferent to the fate of the Jews throughout Europe. At worst, it facilitated their oppression.

None of this is to say that the church is wrong to condemn Israel’s brutal wars of aggression against the Palestinians. But we need to do so with the full recognition and frank admission that the state of Israel came into existence as a result of centuries of exclusion, persecution and violence against Jews routinely sanctioned by the church. For Jews both in Israel and elsewhere, the state represents both a sanctuary and a bulwark of defense against a world filled with hostility toward them. To suggest that Israelis abandon their efforts to continue the existence of a Jewish state, acquiesce to a pan Palestinian democracy and trust in the good will of the international order that failed them so spectacularly in the 1930s and 1940s-that is a mighty big ask. A just and lasting peace must therefore ensure the safety and wellbeing of Jews in their ancestral homeland as well as freedom and self determination for Palestinians whose claim to the land, on the same grounds, is no less legitimate. What shape such a peace might take is well beyond the scope of this article. Suffice to say that Disciples of Jesus must stand with the Palestinian people against the violence of the Israeli government while standing with the Jewish people against the growing tide of antisemitism. That will surely prove more difficult in practice than in theory. But Jesus never asks us to do anything that is easy.

Here are two poems, one by Palestinian author Mahmoud Darwish and the other by the Israeli poet, Yehuda Amichai reflecting upon life in a land they both regard as theirs and holy.

To Our Land

To our land,

and it is the one near the word of god,

a ceiling of clouds

To our land,

and it is the one far from the adjectives of nouns,

the map of absence

To our land,

and it is the one tiny as a sesame seed,

a heavenly horizon … and a hidden chasm

To our land,

and it is the one poor as a grouse’s wings,

holy books … and an identity wound

To our land,

and it is the one surrounded with torn hills,

the ambush of a new past

To our land, and it is a prize of war,

the freedom to die from longing and burning

and our land, in its bloodied night,

is a jewel that glimmers for the far upon the far

and illuminates what’s outside it …

As for us, inside,

we suffocate more!

Source: The Butterfly’s Burden, by Mahmoud Darwish, (pub. by Copper Canyon Press, 2007)

Jews in the Land of Israel

We forget where we came from. Our Jewish

names from the Exile give us away,

bring back the memory of flower and fruit, medieval cities,

metals, knights who turned to stone, roses,

spices whose scent drifted away, precious stones, lots of red,

handicrafts long gone from the world

(the hands are gone too).

Circumcision does it to us,

as in the Bible story of Shechem and the sons of Jacob,

so that we go on hurting all our lives.

What are we doing, coming back here with this pain?

Our longings were drained together with the swamps,

the desert blooms for us, and our children are beautiful.

Even the wrecks of ships that sank on the way

reached this shore,

even winds did. Not all the sails.

What are we doing

in this dark land with its

yellow shadows that pierce the eyes?

(Every now and then someone says, even after forty

or fifty years: “The sun is killing me.”)

What are we doing with these souls of mist, with these names,

with our eyes of forests, with our beautiful children,

with our quick blood?

Spilled blood is not the roots of trees

but it’s the closest thing to roots

we have.

Source: The Poetry of Yehuda Amichai (Farrar Straus and Giroux, 2015)

Mahmoud Darwish (1941-2008) was a Palestinian author and poet. He was author of the Palestinian Declaration of Independence formally establishing the State of Palestine in November 1988. Darwish is widely regarded as the country’s national poet. His poetry and other literature, for which he won numerous awards internationally, was published in Arabic, though he was fluent in English, French and Hebrew. Darwish served as an editor for several literary magazines in both Israel and the Palestinian territories.

Darwish’s family fled to Lebanon during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, but returned to Israel a year later where they were granted residency status. In 1970, Darwish left Israel to study in the Soviet Union, where he attended Moscow State University for one year.  In 1971, he moved to Cairo, Egypt, where he worked for the daily newspaper al-Ahram. In 1973, Darwish joined the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and was consequently banned from entering Israel. He was elected to the PLO Executive Committee in 1987. Over his lifetime of 67 years Darwish published more than thirty volumes of poetry and eight books of prose. You can read more about Mahmoud Darwish and sample more of his poetry at the Poetry Foundation website.

Yehuda Amichai is one of Israel’s most prominent poets. He was born in Germany in 1924 but left with his family for Palestine in 1935. As a young man he volunteered and fought in World War II as a soldier in the British Army. After discharge from the British Army in 1946, Amichai was a student at David Yellin College of Education in Jerusalem and became a teacher in Haifa. Amichai fought in the 1948 Arab/Israeli war on the southern front in the Negev. After the war, Amichai studied the Torah and Hebrew literature at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Encouraged by one of his professors at Hebrew University, he published his first book of poetry in 1955. In 1956, Amichai served in the Sinai War and in 1973 he served in the Yom Kippur War. Amichai was a visiting professor at the University of California, Berkeley during the 1970s and was a poet in residence at New York University in 1987. Amichai was invited in 1994 by Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin to read from his poems at the ceremony of the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo. His poems have been translated into English, French, German and Swedish. You can read more about Yehuda Amichai and his poetry on the Poetry Foundation Website.

Deep Reading

NINTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST

1 Kings 3:5-12

Psalm 119:129-136

Romans 8:26-39

Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52

Prayer of the Day: Beloved and sovereign God, through the death and resurrection of your Son you bring us into your kingdom of justice and mercy. By your Spirit, give us your wisdom, that we may treasure the life that comes from Jesus Christ, our Savior and Lord.

“Your decrees are wonderful;
    therefore my soul keeps them.
The unfolding of your words gives light;
    it imparts understanding to the simple.” Psalm 119:129-130.

          In pre-literate cultures there are no books. There is no written language by which knowledge and information can be communicated to succeeding generations. Continuity must therefore be maintained through stories, songs, liturgy and dance. Skills are passed on from parent to child through participation in the crafts and activities required to sustain the community. Religious teaching, like everything else, must be internalized. The words of God are “kept in the soul,” where they “unfold” as one grows, giving “light” and “understanding” by which one learns to navigate the various stages of life from cradle to grave.

Our psalm for the coming Sunday, cited in part above, illustrates the point. While it is true that this work has been committed to writing, it surely had a pre-written existence. The lines of each strophe in the psalm begin with successive letters of the Hebrew alphabet, a design to render them singable and to aid the memory. Though admittedly lacking in chronologically progressive order in terms of a coherent theme, the psalm revolves constantly around the Torah experienced by the psalmist as reliable guide, faithful companion, relentless judge, purifying fire and source of endless joy. Professor Walter Brueggeman, rightly recognizes this psalm as “a massive intellectual achievement” through which the psalmist affirms that the Torah meets us at every stage of life addressing every human experience from “A to Z,” or more precisely “alpeh to tav.” Brueggeman, Walter, The Message of the Psalms, (c. 1984 by Augsburg Publishing House), p. 40.

Long after the advent of written language, Christian communities remained largely pre-literate. Their religious education came through listening to sermons, participation in liturgy and contemplation of graphic representations of biblical themes. Literacy was confined to relative few including the clergy, university professors and the ruling elite. The ability to write and read written texts was rare among common folk for whom it was unnecessary. But that began to change with the Reformation and the Renaissance. The invention of the printing press made publication of documents in mass for public consumption possible. Literacy rates and opportunities for education increased. Texts like the Bible, Greek and Latin classics as well as the speeches and sermons of religious and civil leaders became accessible to the public. Common people had more access to more information than ever before.

There are some obvious parallels between the invention of the printing press and the rise of the internet. Information that would formerly have taken days or even months to accumulate from public libraries, government agencies, state and national archives can now be gleaned from online sources in less than an hour. This information revolution had a profound effect on my own profession in the law. When I first began practicing, multiparty cases involving multiple jurisdictions and their distinct statutes and rules could be handled only by big city firms equipped with massive law libraries staffed by attorneys whose chief responsibility was to research law applicable to these complex cases. But with the advent of online resources such as Lexis and Westlaw, small and midsize firms could buy subscriptions to the same legal resources accessible with a few keystrokes. This development not only leveled the playing field. It rendered the big firms that charged hourly fees to conduct days of research among dusty tomes cumbersome, inefficient, overstaffed, bureaucratic dinosaurs ill equipped to survive in the new business climate.  

In the same way, information has become more readily available to the public at large. Our phones give us access to libraries, government agencies, commercial entities and data banks of every kind. Our watches notify us of breaking news in real time. Weather forecasts, stock market indices and minute by minute sports reporting are all at our fingertips. Today’s news is old news before it ever goes to print. The average American in the twenty-first century has access to more information than any previous generation.

As a blogger publishing my work on the internet, I am hardly in a position to denigrate all things digital. I am convinced that, notwithstanding the dangers it presents, the world wide web and the opportunities it presents for information sharing, education and provision of public services is a benefit to humanity. At the same time, however, I cannot help but wonder if something is not lost here. If you were to ask post printing press believers where their Bible is located, they might answer that it is on their night stand or on the coffee table or on one of their book shelves. Today’s believers might well say that their Bible is on a CD or a flash drive or somewhere in the Cloud. Preliterate believers would say, however, that their Bible is the only place it can be-in their hearts. It seems to me that with each technological advance in the preservation and transmission of information, we have become increasingly detached from what we know. Why memorize what you can easily look up in the book? Why waste time paging through a book for a passage or information that a search engine can pull up for you in a matter of seconds?  The more accessible information becomes, the less need there is to internalize it. Yet, according to the psalmist, that is precisely what we are supposed to do with scriptures. They are not meant to sit idly on a shelf until consulted or to float disembodied in cyberspace. The words of scripture must be planted in the depths of the soul where they unfold like blossoms transforming the hearts and minds of believers. As the collect of Archbishop Thomas Cranmer reminds us, we are called to “read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest” the scriptures.

In a recently published article in The Atlantic, staff writer Rose Horowitch argues that we in the United States are fast becoming a postliterate culture. The Atlantic (August 2026). She points out that people of all ages and backgrounds are reading substantially less from classical works of literature, books dealing in some detail with scientific, historical or cultural issues and newspapers providing in depth coverage of contemporary events. Horowitch notes that in 1958 the English translation of Doctor Zhivago by Boris Pasternak was the year’s best selling novel. Last year’s best selling novel was Sunrise on the Reaping, the most recent installment of the young adult series, Hunger Games. At the risk of seeming to be snobbish, I read Doctor Zhivago my sophomore year in high school. To be sure, I read plenty of comic books as well, but I understood, as did most of my classmates, the difference between serious literature and pure entertainment.

I grew up in a two newspaper household. The Bremerton Sun provided in depth coverage of local news and events while the Seattle Post Intelligencer afforded a national and global perspective. Of course, reading a syndicated newspaper takes time and patience. The world is a complex place and events, both local and national, are understood and interpreted differently by persons and groups with varying interests and perspectives. Good journalism seeks always to give voice to all such perspectives and expose the nuances and complexities involved. It seeks not so much to provide explanations as to equip readers with the information and context required to form their own reasoned conclusions. As the demise of major independent newspapers throughout the country demonstrates, the public has little patience for lengthy and comprehensive articles. The news in easy bite size pieces can be downloaded, often at no cost, from any number of online media platforms. Less is more.

It is debatable how much, if at all, online platforms and social media are responsible for this trend. What is clearly indisputable, however, is the fact that we are reading less, reading more superficially and reading ever more frequently material of dubious value and accuracy. Moreover, unlike preliterate societies, our postliterate world lacks the traditional social and ritual infrastructure for maintaining and transferring culture, values and faith to the next generation. Ironically, our generation has more information available to it than any previous generation, yet we increasingly lack both the desire and the conceptual tools to process it. Horowitch believes that, just the growth in literacy proved transformative for human civilization, the demise thereof will be equally impactful. She fears that we may be on the brink of a new dark age.

It was during the dark ages following disintegration of the Roman Empire that the church performed in its monasteries an invaluable service to civilization by copying and preserving great works of antiquity. It is for the same reason that the church must make common cause with all who seek to preserve independent newspapers, public libraries, liberal arts curriculum in our institutions of learning and the promotion of reading in all levels of education. More significantly, we are called upon by the psalmist to internalize the scriptures witnessing to the obedient life, faithful death and glorious resurrection of Jesus and the reign of God he proclaims. The psalmist invites us to read deeply, think deeply and pray deeply in the midst of a shallow and superficial culture.

Here is a poem by Henry Braun illustrating the power and effect of deep reading.

On Reading Late

Some evenings fragility

Lays itself out on roads

From the novel you are reading,

Old particular enlargements

That keep you wakeful

Long after the book closes.

Someone was alive

Whom you followed by oil lamp

For hours through the pages

And now, in a quiet house,

Everyone breathing must be looked at

And more than looked at,

Accompanied.

Source: Poetry, (April, 1971). Henry Braun (1930–2014) was an American poet, teacher, and peace activist. Born in Olean, New York, he lost his mother when he was two years old. He spent part of his childhood in an orphanage and foster homes in Buffalo. He was ultimately raised by his father and attended Hutchinson Central High School. After graduating from Brandeis University, he spent a year in France. Upon returning, he earned a master’s degree from Boston University. In the 1960s Braun opposed the Vietnam War. He organized poetry read-ins and donated his war tax dollars to a veterans’ hospital and to Philadelphia public schools. As a result, he was convicted of tax evasion. He also organized a draft card turn-in at the Justice Department for which he was an unindicted co-conspirator at the “Boston Five” trial. In 1968 his first poetry collection was published and nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. He was a Contributing Editor for the American Poetry Review.